[1]万玉山,韩 惠,沈 梦,等.铅污染土壤的电动修复实验研究[J].常州大学学报(自然科学版),2018,30(06):66-71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2018.06.010]
　WAN Yushan,HAN Hui,SHEN Meng,et al.Experimental Study on Electrokinetic Remediation of Pb Contaminated Soil[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Natural Science Edition),2018,30(06):66-71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2018.06.010]
点击复制

铅污染土壤的电动修复实验研究()
分享到：

常州大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:2095-0411/CN:32-1822/N]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
66-71
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-11-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experimental Study on Electrokinetic Remediation of Pb Contaminated Soil
作者:
万玉山; 韩 惠; 沈 梦; 温 馨; 王明新
(常州大学 环境与安全工程学院,江苏 常州 213164)
Author(s):
WAN Yushan;  HAN Hui;  SHEN Meng;  WEN Xin;  WANG Mingxin
(School of Environmental & Safety Engineering,Changzhou University,Changzhou 213164,China)
关键词:
Pb污染土壤;  电动修复;  去除率;  能耗
Keywords:
Pb contaminated soil;  electrokinetic remediation;  removal rate;  energy consumption
分类号:
X 53
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2018.06.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了提高电动修复Pb污染土壤的效率,通过配制Pb污染土壤,搭建电动修复实验装置,研究电压梯度、修复时间、电解液种类和不同通电方式对电动修复Pb污染土壤中Pb去除率的影响。结果表明:电动修复时间96 h,电压梯度从0.5 V· cm-1增加至1.0 V· cm-1时,总Pb去除率增加11.26%,电压梯度从1.0 V· cm-1增加至1.5 V· cm-1时,总去除率仅增加2.77%; 与电动修复72 h相比,运行96 h的修复率增加4.31%,总能耗增加20.33%,运行120 h的修复率增加6.4%,总能耗却增加了40.22%; 与柠檬酸为电解液对比,乙酸组修复率增加12.42%,总耗能增加了42.22%; 而盐酸组修复率增加17.66%,总耗能却增加了70.46%; 间歇通电和交换电极的通电方式与常规的修复方式相比,总Pb去除率分别上升了8.65%和31.05%,能耗分别降低了58.03%和44.9%。间歇通电、交换电极方向能提高电动修复Pb污染土壤的Pb的去除率,同时降低能耗。
Abstract:
In order to improve the efficiency of electrokinetic remediation of Pb contaminated soil, we studied the effects of Electric field intensity, repair time, type of electrolyte and different electrified mode on the removal of Pb in polluted soil. The results showed that the total Pb removal rate increased by 11.26% when the electric field intensity was increased from 0.5 V· cm-1 to 1.0 V· cm-1 after 96 hours of electric repair. When the electric field strength increased from 1.0 V· cm-1 to 1.5 V· cm-1, the total removal rate just increased by 2.77%. Compared with the 72 hours of electric repair, the recovery rate of 96 hours operation increased by 4.31%, and the total energy consumption increased by 20.33%; while the repair rate after 120 hours operation increased by 6.4%, the total energy consumption increased by 40.22%. Compared with citric acid electrolyte, the acetic acid group’s repair rate increased 12.42%, and the total energy consumption increased by 42.22%. The rate of repair in the hydrochloric acid group increased by 17.66%, while the total energy consumption increased by 70.46%. Intermittent energization and exchange electrode energization compared with conventional repair methods, the total Pb removal rate increased by 8.65% and 31.05%, energy consumption decreased by 58.03% and 44.9%, respectively. The Intermittent energization and exchange electrode energization of the cathode can improve the removal rate of Pb inpolluted soil and reduce the energy consumption.

参考文献/References:


[1]雷娜娜,何晓曼,柯俊峰.化学修复剂修复重金属污染土壤的应用进展[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(21):107-110.
[2]肖楚,李礼,查忠勇.铅污染土壤的修复技术研究进展[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版),2012,29(3):99-104.
[3]郭晓方,卫泽斌,吴启堂.乙二胺四乙酸在重金属污染土壤修复过程的降解及残留[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):272-278.
[4]李韵诗,冯冲凌,吴晓芙,等.重金属污染土壤植物修复中的微生物功能研究进展[J].生态学报,2015,35(20):6881-6890.
[5]许妍哲,方战强.生物炭修复土壤重金属的研究进展[J].环境工程,2015,33(2):156-159.
[6]范筱林,王中正.土壤原位修复技术研究进展[J].农业与技术,2015,35(18):29-30.
[7]VIRKUTYT J,SILLANP?? M,LATOSTENMAA P.Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2002,289(1/2/3):97.
[8]WANG J Y,ZHANG D S, STABNIKOVA O.et al.Evaluation of electrokinetic removal of heavy metal from sewage sludge[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2005,124(1/2/3):139-146.
[9]王业耀,孟凡生,陈锋.阴极pH控制对污染土壤电动修复效率的影响[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(2):36-40.
[10]胡宏韬.电动和渗透反应格栅联合修复镉污染地下水[J]. 环境工程学报,2009,3(10):1773-1777.
[11]WANG Q Y, ZHOU D M, CANG L,et al.Application of bioassays to evaluate a copper contaminated soil before and after a pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation[J]. Environmental Pollution,2009,157(2):410.
[12]刘慧.铜污染场地土壤的原位电动强化修复[J]. 环境工程学报,2016,10(7):3877-3883.
[13]林丹妮, 谢国樑, 曾彩明,等.不同电压对重金属污染河涌底泥电动修复效果的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,2009,30(3):8-12.
[14]ZHOU D M, DENG C F,ALSHAWABKEH A N,et al.Effects of catholyte conditioning on electrokinetic extraction of copper from mine tailings[J].Environment International,2005,31(6):885-890.
[15]李欣.重金属污染土壤修复技术的研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2003.
[16]SONG Y,AMMAMI M T,BENAMAR A,et al.Effect of EDTA, EDDS,NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As,Cd,Cr,Cu,Ni,Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int,2016,23(11):10577-10586.
[17]席永慧,梁穑嫁,周光华.重金属污染土壤的电动力学修复试验研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(11):1626-1630.
[18]仲洋洋.电动力修复Pb污染土壤的实验研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2015.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41641032)。
作者简介:万玉山(1969—),男,安徽淮北人,博士,副教授。E-mail: wanyushan@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-28