[1]周 宁,任福平,刘暄亚,等.地下综合管廊管道泄漏扩散的研究进展[J].常州大学学报(自然科学版),2019,31(01):63-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2019.01.010]
 ZHOU Ning,REN Fuping,LIU Xuanya,et al.Research Progress of Pipeline Leakage and Diffusion in Underground Comprehensive Pipelines[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Natural Science Edition),2019,31(01):63-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2019.01.010]
点击复制

地下综合管廊管道泄漏扩散的研究进展()
分享到:

常州大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:2095-0411/CN:32-1822/N]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
63-70
栏目:
石油与天然气工程
出版日期:
2019-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research Progress of Pipeline Leakage and Diffusion in Underground Comprehensive Pipelines
文章编号:
2095-0411(2019)01-0063-08
作者:
周 宁1任福平1刘暄亚2王伟天1黄维秋1赵会军1
(1.常州大学 石油工程学院,江苏 常州 213016; 2.公安部天津消防研究所 科技处,天津 300381)
Author(s):
ZHOU Ning1 REN Fuping1 LIU Xuanya2 WANG Weitian1 HUANG Weiqiu1 ZHAO Huijun1
(1. School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213016, China; 2. Department of Science and Technology, Tianjin Fire Research Institute, Ministry of Public Security, Tianjin 300381, China)
关键词:
地下综合管廊 管道泄漏 泄漏扩散 事故后果
Keywords:
underground comprehensive gallery pipeline leakage leakage diffusion accident consequences
分类号:
X 937
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2019.01.010
摘要:
地下综合管廊管道泄漏扩散引起的突发事故,往往造成重大损失和社会影响,针对国内外地下综合管廊管道泄漏扩散问题,从实验研究、理论分析及数值模拟3方面对其研究现状进行了归纳分析。在实验方面以典型实验方法为依据,分析了现有实验存在的问题; 在理论分析方面建立了不同介质泄漏的数学模型,用其确定关键物理参数; 在数值模拟方面主要对单源泄漏扩散进行研究,一般均为二维模拟计算。此外还结合研究现状总结了一些地下综合管廊管道泄漏扩散的规律。在以后的研究中不仅应该侧重于多源泄漏扩散的三维数值模拟计算,而且需要根据实际工况开展一些典型的验证实验,不断对理论分析模型进行合理修正。
Abstract:
Sudden accidents caused by the proliferation of pipeline leaks in underground comprehensive pipelines often result in heavy losses and social impacts. This article addresses the problems of pipeline leakage diffusion at home and abroad from experimental research, theoretical analysis and numerical simulation. In the experimental aspect, based on the typical experimental methods, the existing problems in the existing experiments were analyzed. In the theoretical analysis, the mathematical models of different media leakages were established, and the key physical parameters were determined. In the numerical simulation, the single source leakage diffusion was mainly performed. Studies are generally two-dimensional simulations. In addition, combined with the research status, the rules of the leakage and diffusion of some underground comprehensive pipe corridors are summarized. In the future research, we should not only focus on the three-dimensional numerical simulation of multi-source leakage diffusion, but also need to carry out some typical verification tests based on the actual working conditions and continue to rationally correct the theoretical analysis model.

参考文献/References:


[1]世界其他国家综合管廊发展历程及建设情况[J]. 隧道建设,2016(6):635.
[2]于晨龙,张作慧. 国内外城市地下综合管廊的发展历程及现状[J]. 建设科技,2015(17):49-51.
[3]王彦星. 我国城市地下管线综合管廊发展与展望[J]. 工程技术研究,2017(8):244-245.
[4]王贝,戴素娟. 浅谈我国城市地下综合管廊建设的必要性以及发展前景[J]. 安徽建筑,2015(6):43.
[5]李世毅. 天然气管线纳入综合管廊研究[J]. 智能城市,2017(1):1.
[6]汪志云. 国内综合管廊建设中存在的问题及解决思路[J]. 市政技术,2016,34(2):126-127,131.
[7]徐匆匆,马向英,何江龙,等. 城市地下管线安全发展的现状、问题及解决办法[J]. 城市发展研究,2013,20(3):108-112,118.
[8]黎珍,尤英俊,杨光. 综合管廊内天然气管道的安全性探讨[J]. 煤气与热力,2016,36(11):1-7.
[9]冯志华,聂百胜. 危险气体泄漏扩散的实验方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2006,16(7):18-23.
[10]FAY J A. Model of spills and fires from LNG and oil tankers[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2003,96(2):171-188.
[11]RAJ P K. LNG fires:a review of experimental results, models and hazard prediction challenges[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2007,140(3):444-464.
[12]PITBLADO R, BAIK J. RAGHUNATHAN V. LNG decision making approaches compared[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2006,130(1):148-154.
[13]ERMAK D L,CHAN S T,MORGAN D L. A comparison of dense dispersion model simulations with burro series LNG spill test results[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,1982,6:129-160.
[14]KOOPMAN R P,MCRAE T G,GOIDWIRE H C. Results of recent large-scale NH3 and N2O4 dispersion experiments[C]// Proceedings of the Third Symposium on the Heavy Gas Risk Assessment-Ⅲ. Bonn: [s.n.],1984:137-156.
[15]姜传胜,丁辉. 重气连续泄漏扩散的风洞模拟实验与数值模拟结果对比分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2003,13(2):8-17.
[16]ROBINS A,CASTRO I,HAYDEN P. A wind tunnel study of dense gas dispersion in a neutral boundary layer over a rough surface[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2001,35(13):2243-2252.
[17]SNYDER W H. Wind-tunnel study of entrainment in two-dimensional dense-gas plumes at the EPA’s fluid modeling facility[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2001,35(13):2285-2304.
[18]麻柏坤,张和平. 烟气运动的盐水模拟实验[J]. 实验力学,1994,9(4):317-322.
[19]HALL D J,WALKER S. Scaling rules for reduced-scale field releases of hydrogen fluoride[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,1997,54:89-111.
[20]胡圣超. LNG储罐泄漏蒸气扩散模拟研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2014.
[21]霍春勇,董玉华,余大涛,等. 长输管线气体泄漏率的计算方法研究[J]. 石油学报,2004,25(1):101-105.
[22]蒋军成. 事故调查与分析技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2003:219-238.
[23]SPIJKERBOER H P,BENIERS J E,JASPERS D,et al. Ability of the gaussian plume model to predict and describe spore dispersal over a potato crop[J]. Ecological Modeling,2002,15(1):1-18.
[24]ARYSTANBEKOV N K. Application of gaussian plume models for air pollution simulation at instantaneous emissions[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,2004,67(4/5):451-458.
[25]ELKINTON J S,CARDE R T,MASON C J. Evaluation of time-average dispersion models for estimating pheromone concentration in a deciduous forest[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,1984,10(7):1081-1108.
[26]王福军. 计算流体动力学分析——CFD软件原理与应用[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2004:110-117.
[27]马跃,王岳. 埋地管道泄漏油品扩散范围模拟计算[J]. 北京石油化工学院学报,2012,20(4):24.
[28]李朝阳,马贵阳,刘亮. 埋地输油管道泄漏油品扩散模拟[J]. 油气储运,2011,30(9):674-676.
[29]CALAY R K,HOLDO A E. Modeling the dispersion of flashing jets using CFD[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,154(1):1198-1209.
[30]李泽,马贵阳. 不同油品管道泄漏的数值模拟[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报,2015,35(4):21-35.
[31]姚志强. 埋地原油管道油品泄漏扩散三维数值模拟[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):132-136.
[32]ENGLAND W G,TEUSCHER L H,HAUSER L E,et al. Atmospheric dispersion of liquefied natural gas vapor clouds using SIGMET,a three-dimensional time dependent hydrodynamic computer mode[C]. California: Stanford University Press,1978.
[33]TAUSEEF S M,RASHTCHIAN D,ABBASI S A. CFD-based simulation of dense gas dispersion in presence of obstacles[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2011,24(4):371-376.
[34]程猛猛,赵玲,吴明,等. 架空天然气管道泄漏扩散数值模拟[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报,2013,33(3):32-34.
[35]CHAN S T,ERMAK D L,MORRIS L K. FEM3 model simulations of selected Thorney Island phase I trials[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,1987,16:267-292.
[36]王海蓉,马晓茜. LNG重气连续点源泄漏扩散的数值模拟研究[J]. 天然气工业,2006,26(9):144-146.
[37]李一庆. 坡面天然气管道泄漏扩散数值模拟[J]. 当代化工,2013,42(3):339-342.

相似文献/References:

[1]邵 辉,张蓉爱,王新颖,等.气、 液管道泄漏实验装置的设计[J].常州大学学报(自然科学版),2008,(02):45.
 SH A O H ui,ZH A N G Rong- ai,WA N G Xin- ying,et al.Study of Experimental Equipment Deisigns for Leakage of Gas and Liquid Pipelines[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Natural Science Edition),2008,(01):45.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-06-11。
基金项目:国家重点研发计划资助(2017YFC0806000); 建筑消防工程技术公安部重点实验室开放课题(KFKT2015ZD03); 公安部科技项目(2016JSYJD04)。
作者简介:周宁(1977—),男,江苏常州人,博士,教授。E-mail:zhouning@cczu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-20